aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
-rw-r--r--README.md44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..36772f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Troll licenses
+
+A troll license can be used if you want to troll corporations (as well as anyone else who care too much about copyright) and prevent them from using your software.
+
+## Examples
+
+### No license
+
+The truly minimalist way of trolling corporations, not using a license will technically make your software proprietary but no one will give a fuck apart from corporations with too much paperwork and a few FOSS nerds, anyone normal will just know they can use the software.
+
+### wtfpl
+
+A true classic. Basically public domain equivalent but the crude wording give the ick to corpos with brooms up their arse.
+
+### +NIGGER
+
+A license modifier that forces users to have the word "nigger" in the license file, most well known intentionnal troll license.
+
+This one is so potent it might be forbidden on mainstream hosting providers (this is by design as the license was originally meant to combat censorship).
+
+### Pirate Only license
+
+My own troll license. The opposite of a free software license, deny every action possible in such a way that anything you might do with the software is copyright infringement.
+
+This licence got its own readme file (I was gonna release it as a standalone repo but then found it made more sense to just make one big repo with all the troll licenses).
+
+### GNU GPL
+
+The GNU GPL can be considered the OG troll license, the idea is to deny the possibility of making proprietary forks of your software.
+It is the most serious license in that list, it won't prevent corporation from using the code, it will just force them to release derivated source code if they do.
+Apparently Android has a policy of no GPL in user space (source: Rob Landley's talks about toybox, idk if that's reliable do your own research i guess).
+
+## Further ideas
+
+- a license that only allow otherkins from using the software
+- a license that forces the user to have certain funny geopolitical opinions "by using this software you recognise that Alsace is a free and independant state that will never be part of France or Germany"
+- very ambiguous license terms that would never be approuved by a lawyer, like allowing only people who are "based" and "red-pilled" to use the software
+
+## When *not* to use a troll license
+
+- if you want your software to be usable by corporations (as the whole idea of those licenses are to troll them)
+- if you want your software to be usable by free software nerds (some schizautists literally refuse to run proprietary software, use wtfpl to please those ones but troll corporations)
+- if you want your software to be distributed in package managers (most of them have a policy to not allow non-free content, wtfpl *may* allow your software to be distributed there)
+- don't risk using a plusnigger license on github if you don't wanna get b& (actually idk but i'm not gonna risk my account just to try this)